Can I afford this refactor? Check your plan limits first
ACTVT reads your Claude and Codex plan usage from the provider: how much of the 5-hour session window and the weekly window is used, and when each resets. Agents can ask for it over MCP with the agent_usage_limits tool before starting a long job, and the same usage limits are in ACTVT’s Overview. Plan usage meters are part of the Premium tier.
0:484 chapters
Step by step
0:00Ask before you start
A two-hour job is ahead, on a plan with usage limits. Before starting, ask Claude Code whether it fits.
0:15Claude checks the plan
Claude asks ACTVT for the plan’s current usage. It fits: 8% of the 5-hour window is used, and 40% of the week. Each window comes with its reset time, read from the provider.
0:26The same numbers in ACTVT
The same windows are live in ACTVT’s Overview: Claude’s session and weekly limits with reset countdowns, Codex’s weekly window beside them, and the plan each one is on.
0:42Spend, honestly labelled
ACTVT prices spend is at API rates. On a subscription plan that is not what you actually pay, and ACTVT labels it correctly.
More tutorials
All tutorials →
1:24Every machine you code on
See agent sessions from every machine you code on, over SSH
Start Claude Code on another Mac over SSH, watch the session live from your own, and read the full transcript when it finishes.
3:42Leftover ports
Find and kill the dev server your AI agent left running
Claude Code starts a dev server, quits, and leaves port 3000 taken. ACTVT spots the orphan and frees the port safely.
2:14Agent or machine?
Was it the AI agent, or my Mac? Diagnose a slow agent run
A Codex build felt slow. Claude asks ACTVT what the Mac was doing during that session, and gets an answer backed by numbers.
Try it on your own agents
ACTVT is free to start, and reads the session files Claude Code, Codex CLI and Pi already write. Nothing to configure.